Talk:Edith of Wessex

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 18, 2019 and December 18, 2023.

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am no expert at all, so could someone check if the last line is correct? It states that Edith was the only senior member of the Godwine family to survive the Norman Conquest, but didn't her brother Wulfnoth live until 1091? Thanks, 82.16.0.232 (talk) 11:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm no expert either, but it appears that Wulfnoth remained a captive in Normandy, so Edith was the only senior member of the Godwin family to survive the Norman Conquest on English soil. I edited the entry to clarify this. I also standardized the spelling of the family name to "Godwin" throughout. The article on Edith's father identifies the various spellings of the Godwin family name; this article will look cleaner if we use just one spelling. Drfryer (talk) 05:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Place and cause of death

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Where did she die, and what was the cause of death? At present the stub gives only the date of death. Norvo (talk) 00:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

See my recent edit. Cavila (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Date of marriage

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article states that she "was Queen of England from her marriage to Edward the Confessor in 1045" but also that she "married Edward on 23 January 1043.^[1] But ODNB actually says "she was married to Edward (d. 1066) on 23 January 1045". I will amend the article accordingly.Alekksandr (talk) 14:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Williams, Ann (2004). "Edith (d. 1075)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8483. Retrieved 15 June 2008. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

Bias

Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is it really necessary to say that the Vita is 'inevitably biased'? Surely that's a truism? Katiehawks (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Agreed! It would be worth noting the nature and ideally an example or instance of bias, but otherwise this feels redundant. (Everything is "biased".) Gabrielbodard (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Williams, Ann (2004). "Edith (d. 1075)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8483. Retrieved 15 June 2008. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

[1]