Talk:Edmund Morgan (historian)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weird Sentence
edit"As an undergraduate at Harvard, Morgan was profoundly influenced by historian Perry Miller, who became a lifelong friend. Although both were atheists, they had a deep understanding and respect for Puritan religion.[8]"
I'm uncomfortable with the implication that Wikipedia is making here that an interest or expertise in the Puritans would imply a particular religious ideology.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edmund Morgan (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120610045234/http://www.oah.org:80/about/past_officers.html to http://www.oah.org/about/past_officers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Edmund Morgan (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050915123413/http://www.yale.edu/history/faculty/morgan.html to http://www.yale.edu/history/faculty/morgan.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426060715/http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/24049.html to http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/24049.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
disgusting liberal apologist
editMorgan was a disgusting liberal apologist and hardly an impartial expositor of "Puritanism" which he appears to have really understood nothing about. He was IMHO, like Hofstadter and Bailyn, a celebrity propagandist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.40 (talk) 01:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- The unanimous consensus among historians who sign their names is that he was one of the very best colonial historians out of many hundreds who worked in the field. Rjensen (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)