Talk:Edmund of Abingdon

ER

This is a very nice example of incoherent 19th century nationalism. The entry depicts Edmund as a member of a "national party" in ecclesiastical politics. He was so offended at giving benefices to "Romans" that he does what? Retires to a monastery in France! GOSH the English could be self-deceiving! O.K. - there WAS no such thing as a 'national' party. The benefices were not being given to native Roman clergymen, but to members of the papal administration and Edmund was offended not as an Englishman against Italians but as a local archbishop against the central administration. I find it interesting to imagine shipping the cash from the 300 benefices from England to Rome in the 13th century - something the author of the entry elides. Oh, well. I'm going to leave this up for a little bit before revising so that others can see my rant. -—Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelTinkler (talk • contribs)

Monied classes

I think that category has to go. --evrik 22:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Title

I'm not sure why the article is called Edmund Rich, as he is universally known as Edmund of Abingdon, and even the article itself says "Rich" was never applied to him and his siblings. Don't we name according to the most commonly used non-ambiguous name? Lindsay 13:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Project

Archbishops of Canterbury are all of some degree of importance to the Anglican project, be they from the middle ages, the Reformation, or beyond. -- Secisek (talk) 21:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Edmund of Abingdon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130818020453/http://st-edmund-millwall.org.uk/stedmund.html to http://www.st-edmund-millwall.org.uk/stedmund.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926204336/http://www.seh.ox.ac.uk/index.cfm?do=viewHistoricalEvent&historyID=1 to http://www.seh.ox.ac.uk/index.cfm?do=viewHistoricalEvent&historyID=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070812084957/http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/sainte24.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/sainte24.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Edmund of Abingdon Coat of arms

I have queried the change from cross patonce to cross fleury at Talk:St_Edmund_Hall,_Oxford#St_Edmund_Hall_Coat_of_Arms. Please post there if you have information on the subject. TSventon (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

@Lobsterthermidor: I have reversed the edit as no evidence has been provided so far. TSventon (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)