Talk:Eduardo Maldonado/GA1

Latest comment: 11 months ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 05:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Yo! I shall review this within one week.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 05:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the wait! I have left my comments below.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 20:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nice work on the changes! I am satisfied and can now confidently pass this article for GA status. Congrats!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 16:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check

edit

Earwig says good to go.

File(s)

edit

Image is appropriate and has a valid public CC BY 2.0 license on Commons.

Prose

edit

Refs

edit

Spotcheck: I am using DeepL Translator to translate the text so forgive any errors on my part. Refs 3, 7, 19, 28, 36, 50, 59 and 62 are good.

  • Ref 11 does not seem to support the first sentence: "Although Maldonado's top billing on the MAS's slate of candidates significantly boosted his odds of entering the Senate, he nonetheless actively campaigned for the position".
    Removed mention of his odds being boosted. "Top billing" is still justified; the article labels him "primer candidato a senador", meaning candidate occupying the top slot on the party's senatorial list.
    Ahh I see!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 16:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • For ref 45 or 46, I recommend putting a citation directly after "a blue hand dictating the unethical actions of the ... Supreme Electoral Tribunal" as it is a direct quotation.
    Check. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.