Talk:Education/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 19:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

After looking through the article, I haven't seen any reason to quickfail the article (having been told to ignore redlinks), so I'll get right into the review proper

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The prose is clear and concise, and has correct SPaG through the article.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Article follows MoS, its lead section is appropriately long and follows all other MoS guidelines.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	The article contains a references section which contains all of the article's citations as well as a general list of sources.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All inline citations are verifiable (all link to somewhere), and after having randomly checked them (article has 250+ citations), they are related to the topic and reliable
	2c. it contains no original research.	All claims about education are backed up inline
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	After running it through the copyvio detector, that didn't find any plagiarism. After manually checking through the PDF sources etc, I did not find any plagiarism nor copyright violations.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The article addresses the main aspects of the topic in an appropriate level of detail
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The article stays focused on the main topic and specifics (such as country education, types of education, etc) are spun off into their own articles.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	The article uses NPOV through the article and does not give any one topic undue weight
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	The article is stable and does not dramatically change on a day to day basis
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are tagged with copright status as appropriate
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are relevant to the topic and are appropriately captioned.
	7. Overall assessment.	Passed.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.