Talk:Edward II of England

Edward II of England is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 17, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 1, 2014	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
May 10, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
March 31, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 7, 2005, February 7, 2006, February 7, 2008, February 7, 2010, and April 25, 2017.
Current status: Featured article

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages High‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Royalty Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

On 5 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Edward II. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Lead image

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Which of the following two images should be the lead image?

Option A
Option B

The two have switched around a bit, with B used for a few years before A. A has been used for roughly a year or so. There was no discussion to replace B. I prefer B, but happy to let others decide. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 14:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I much prefer Option B for the following reasons:

It has been through the GA and FA processes, both of which would have verified its licensing and use in the article.
Option A currently does not have the correct licensing for the US, which means its use in the article right now is questionable.
Option A is of poorer in terms of quality/clarity.
Option is vertically long, so it looks awkward both in the infobox and in preview when hovering over a link.
Personally, I find Option B more aesthetically pleasing.

Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's been five days and all the current participants (a whopping two users) have expressed support for option B. Thus, I will change the lead image to that and any further objections may be raised here. Unlimitedlead (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I also find option B more appropriate, especially with point 3 in mind. Super20020917 (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Additional Source for ‘Controversies’ Section

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think we can add a source or even a sentence about Edward's possible survival after 1327 from Kathryn Warner's (herself with a Wikipedia page) books "Edward II: An Unconventional King" and "Long Live the King?" Geographynerd101 (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and add it, Geographynerd101. Be Bold! —GoldRingChip 18:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Caernarfon??

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why would an English king be referred to by the Welsh spelling, instead of the English spelling, Caernarvon? English is pronounced properly. 142.205.202.71 (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Caernarfon is the English spelling, although it's valid to point out the variant, especially if it was much more common in the past. Google ngram seems to back up both points: the present name is valid but so was the previous one. — LlywelynII 04:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Edward I of England which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mistaken revert

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Dudley Miles: Aside from improved formatting, the additional points are all entirely valid and helpful to the reader for additional context. Was this just a kneejerk revert? or do the provided sources not include the additional detail and need to be corrected to something more accurate? Either way, reverting isn't the way to fix the problem. (Sorry the 'dubious' note on my edit was mistaken: That was from another article I'd been working on recently.) — LlywelynII 04:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic