Talk:Edward Rotheram

Edward Rotheram has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 29, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / American Revolution / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed this stuff as not strictly relevant at this stage although I can go back in a better format if people want.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fictional references

Appears as a character in the book, Hornblower and the Atropos, C.S. Forester ISBN 0-523-00384-6

External links

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:

What exactly is "unacceptable conduct towards his ship's junior officers and chaplain"?
Perhaps you can add the red links to the list of article reqests at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Maritime warfare task force if you have not done so already. You could do the same for Eliab Harvey.

Nothing here should prevent this artcile from passing. Well done, again. -- Secisek (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The information on the court-martial comes from teh ODNB, which is not forthcoming on the precise nature fo the charges - further detail would probably mean looking at the primary sources (i.e. the records of the court-martial, which are probably preserved in The National Archives, but this would be bordering on OR. David Underdown (talk) 09:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic