Talk:Edwin McMillan
Edwin McMillan has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 6, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Edwin McMillan and Glenn T. Seaborg were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1951 for their discovery of the transuranium elements? | ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 18, 2019, and September 18, 2022. |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI believe the correct name of this man is Edwin Mattison McMillan not Edward. If no-one disagrees I will move this and change the links. Dec 3 2002.
No one has disagreed so at 15.00 today I'll make the move. Dec 12 2002
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Edwin McMillan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 18:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I propose to review this article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
First reading
editThis article reads well. Just a few minor points.
- "McMillan's initial work there involved attempting to measure the magnetic moment of the proton, but he was beaten to it by Otto Stern and Immanuel Estermann." - This is a bit too colloquial in my opinion.
- Tried to re-word it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- "This was mixed with hydrogen and oxygen to produce water, with was then collected with calcium chloride." - This sentence needs attention.
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- " Radioactivity was found concentrated in the calcium chloride, proving that it was in the oxygen." - Calcium chloride does not contain oxygen so is this oxygen in the form of water of crystallization or what?
- Clarified. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- "They bombarded it with neutrons" - Who is "they"?
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I was unaware that uranium had been named after Uranus so perhaps you should spell out the reason for naming the new element neptunium more clearly.
- Sure. I thought it was pretty well known. Had to double-check that the original source covers this. I was surprised to discover that a neutron has a magnetic moment, despite having no charge. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- "The departure of McMillan was caused by the outbreak of World War II in Europe." - This is a new section and this statement is a bit stark. How about prefacing it with "The reason for McMillan's not continuing with this research was ..." or somesuch.
- Re-worded. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- "proposed a radical solution involving explosive lens." - Missing word. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just need a plural. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- "But he was involved with implosion" - Having just mentioned "Little Boy", it might be best to start this sentence with McMillan rather than "He".
- Just need a plural. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wikilink implosion, International Union of Pure and Applied Physics,
- Wikilinked the latter, but implosion-type nuclear weapon is already linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- What is the "phase stability principle"?
- Clarified. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I am unclear as to whether the image is properly licensed. I will need to ask someone else.
- We can add a Fair Use template if required. It is definitely PD in Sweden. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- That's all for the moment. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Final reading
edit- I sought advice from FunkMonk on the image and my understanding of his reply is that it is OK to use the image. I find that the article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose quality and structure, is suitably cited to reliable sources, is neutral and is stable. I believe it meets the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edwin McMillan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004221442/http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v45/i2/p118_s1?bypassSSO=1 to http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v45/i2/p118_s1?bypassSSO=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)