Talk:Efficiency gap

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Superb Owl in topic 'Shortcomings'

Splitting part of wasted vote article into this standalone article

edit

'Shortcomings'

edit

@OveGjerlow, I added a number of templates around original research and made some NPOV rephrasing to try and outline some of the reasons why this section was summarized and removed recently. I noticed you seem new to Wikipedia and want to offer to walk you through and discuss any of the suggestions so that you have a chance to fix what you've worked on so far. 1) NPOV ('Shortcomings' may not be the best way to describe this, unless it's clear that the perspective appears to be universal. Otherwise 'critiques' attributed to specific people may be more appropriate) 2) Clear OR when linking to a Google Spreadsheet instead of a reliable secondary source (will note that the user suggested further citations were forthcoming in their edit) 3) Redundancies with other parts of the article (Mira Bernstein's assessment is already summarized) Superb Owl (talk) 06:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply