Cold Peace and Public Opinion (disclaimer, of sorts)

edit

I moved this material here from Camp David accords not because I think it is good, but because it belongs here if anywhere. Some of it (e.g. discussion of tourism) is, to me, clearly original research and may also be characterized as POV. Much of it needs citations. Still, it's a start to material that should undoubtedly be covered in this article. Hopefully others will work to improve this.--Sjsilverman (talk) 20:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

too much material on 2011 attack on the Israeli embassy

edit

Most of these details can be checked out by clicking through to that article. The fact embassy security was breached is of significance to bilateral relations. All the details of that particular breach are not. The material as presently written is also rather slanted against Egypt; for example "for fear of their lives" is not in the source cited.--Brian Dell (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Future of peace treaty, border incidents, etc.

edit

Reading this article for the first time in a while, it's clear that there's too much of a focus on the period immediately following the 2011 revolution. Given subsequent events, these sections should be substantially revised and, probably, shortened. Does anyone disagree? Federalist51 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Egypt–palestine relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 April 2018

edit

"The two countries also seem to border the Gulf of Aquaba... " is not ideal for two reasons:

A. It is not relevant that each of the countries touches the Gulf of Aquaba -- I would suggest that the better statement is that "The borders the two countries SHARE also MEET at the Gulf of Aqaba...."

B. Countries do not "seem to border" anywhere - they simply border. The sovereign nations of Egypt and Israel have decided that this borderline is their mutually agreed border and have specifically identified their respective territories. If someone wants to drop a footnote as to why the borders are not agreed by parties other than Egypt and Israel, GREAT! But making a mess by saying "seem to border" does not share any information or concept with the reader of this Wikipedia entry. This "seem to border" could be the view of any number of people with diametrically opposing viewpoints -- whether a Greater Israel person, a "Israel does not exist" person, a person who says that Mandate Palestine borders from 1920, 1922 or later don't matter, that Israel or its borders are not really defined, or even a person who is trying to say that Israel should not exist at all. No matter what, this wording of "seem to border" is a fully non-specific mess unworthy of inclusion in this Wikipedia entry (in addition to being non-sense if you believe that two sovereign nations can decide their own border!). Thank you.

SO, PLEASE CHANGE FROM THE CURRENT: "The two countries also seem to border the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea."

TO: "The two countries' borders also meet at the shoreline of the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea." -- AND DROP ALL THE FOOTNOTES YOU WANT!

Contents 45.49.237.21 (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Done L293D ( • ) 20:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Update Nitzana crossing

edit

The crossing at Nitzana is for commercial and tourist traffic only. dindia (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 December 2018

edit

GDP of Egypt should be changed (PPP). 5ofash (talk) 07:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. What should it be changed to? (please provide a reliable source for this new figure) DannyS712 (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 May 2021

edit

The bibliography section’s name is spelled bibligoraphy. Minor issue, but still 73.180.130.114 (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  DoneBerrely • TalkContribs 18:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Outdated Information for Israel

edit

The current prime-minister of Israel is wrong. --DeltaOfficial (talk) 06:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Current Israeli PM of Israel isn't correct

edit

The current Prime Minister of Israel is listed as Benjamin Netanyahu, when it should be Naftali Bennett, I cannot edit this so posting here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Israel — Preceding unsigned comment added by EB-OwO-OP (talkcontribs) 02:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 January 2023

edit

Please change the current leader of Israel from Naftali Bennett to Benjamin Netanyahu

DutifulPotato (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Lightoil (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply