Talk:Eimear McGeown
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments to the draft reviewers
editThe comments below have been moved here from the draft, since the AFCH script did not like them being on that page, and did strange things to them. I haven't modified the comments in any way, simply cut-and-pasted them here. Once the draft is accepted, they can be removed as far as I am concerned, just like the AfC comments are removed. --bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE:: Thankyou for clarifying that. Appreciatted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE:: I have provided the best response I can give for the talk comments on the 'talk page'. I don't know what else I can do. I have done everything correctly by Wiki guidelines and been respectful at all times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE:: The comment above makes it sound as if the action is a gracious one. I have asked question in tearoom and on help page to better understand what I am doing wrong. I have re-read my article and it is honest. Factual. Neautral and in line with the wiki guidelines. There is no conflict of interest and I was begining to be really pleased with myself that I had learnt a new skill and know how to code for a wiki page. But I think reviewers are taking advantage of me for some reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE: I do not know what else I can do??? I am a qualified charted Engineer and there is not a single promotional tone to be found in this article. This is an acomplished musician which has been honored by Queen Elizabeth of England. Who are you? I have the concern that the reviewers are simply creating business for themselves by rejecting this article based on non-factual comments. There has been absolutely no copy and pasting from anywhere. the author is me: Tristan Coates NER CPEng MIEAust. I origianly named the article 'EimearMcGeown for logical reasons as that is what the article relates to. "We referes to me and my partner who are both based in Dublin" What is the basis of your rejection? Why are you rejecting my article with no factual basis? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE: This article is 100% completely original and use of own factual words. We are aware of some websites which have copy and pasted some words whilst the article has been in review— Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE: The User name has been updated The article is written in 100% factual neutral tone. These are all facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)