 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 17 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved, withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Eizo → EIZO – the company name is stylized as EIZO and not Eizo. Therefore I request to rename / move the page to EIZO. Please refer to the website https://www.eizoglobal.com/company/index.html for confirmation of the stylization. Tsunogawa770 (talk) 02:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – WP style does follow how a company stylizes their name. The name Eizo is pretty common in news; it doesn't appear to be an acronym. Dicklyon (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose move. This appears to be a stylization. O.N.R. (talk) 06:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per User:Old Naval Rooftops. Just because the company writes its name as EIZO in the logo doesn't mean the commonly used name isn't Eizo. JIP | Talk 13:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Ok. This is fair. Please close discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsunogawa770 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Source
editThis can be used to expand the article [1] Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)