Contested deletion
editI would like to contest the speedy deletion of the EktaH article under Criterion G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion). While the article discusses a company and its activities, it strictly adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines by presenting factual information supported by reliable sources, without promotional intent. The content details the company’s significant scientific advancements and contributions to the field of obesity treatment, providing context that is relevant and of interest from an encyclopedic standpoint.
The mention of awards and recognitions, such as the i-LAB innovation competition and the “France 2030” projects, are notable achievements that underline the company's importance in its field and its recognition by reputable, external entities. These are typical elements included in similar articles about companies, especially those in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, where innovation and impact are key areas of interest.
Moreover, my contributions to Wikipedia have consistently focused on adding detailed, well-cited articles about companies that are significant in their respective fields. You can verify this by reviewing my contribution history, which shows a pattern of adding well-researched, neutral content.
Therefore, I request that the deletion tag be reconsidered, and I am open to suggestions for improving the article to better meet Wikipedia’s standards rather than removing it entirely. Removing promotional tones, if any are identified by other editors, could be achieved through collaborative editing rather than deletion. Thank you for considering my request. --Adil Faouzi (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)