Talk:Elan Carr
Latest comment: 9 years ago by AlbinoFerret in topic RfC: The endorsements make this an advertisement page
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Image source
editI made the edit on Wikimedia, but the image says it is sourced to the United States Army. It is sourced to Alpha Epsilon Pi fraternity. Here is a link to the Alpha Epsilon Pi website with Elan Carr's official AEPi portrait. Thanks. 65.220.10.3 (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
RfC: The endorsements make this an advertisement page
edit- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There is consensus that the endorsements make the article an advertisement. AlbinoFerret 21:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Should the endorsements section be deleted? Eastwiki2434 (talk) 21:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)eastwiki2434
- Summoned by bot. The answer is yes in that it does not deserve a separate section and any sourced endorsements can be merged somewhere else on this page. However, I wanted to point out that the purpose of RfCs is to settle disputes, and I see no active dispute underway over this rather poorly-sourced and promotional article. I don't see why you can't just edit the article per WP:BRD. Coretheapple (talk) 22:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes - The sections should be removed, especially since it is the longest paragraph on the page. No other related pages include an "Endorsements" section. Meatsgains (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Threaded discussion
editThe article is a mess. I have tagged it for multiple issues. Coretheapple (talk) 22:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- In response to your vote above, I too think we should close this RfC and simply remove the section. I didn't see any dispute and I can't imagine any users opposing its removal. Meatsgains (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Summoned by bot. Cleaned up all self published and unsourced material. The article is now a stub, and material can be added only if supported by reliable secondary sources. - Cwobeel (talk) 04:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.