Talk:Elec-Trak
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elec-Trak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Exceptionally unnecessary cite request, or is it just me?
editMost of these attachments were connected by a 36VDC "power take off" using a NEMA 10-50 outlet, usually used in the U.S. for 240VAC clothes dryers and thus compatible with readily available cords in most of the USA since the sentence itself directly links the NEMA page that explains availability, ubiquity and purpose of the connector, and the page already links collector sites with comprehensive listings of the attachments and their connection types, how could this possibly need an additional cite? There is nothing to add that wouldn't harm the signal to noise ratio of the page as a whole.
- More citations are always better. For online sources, if the websites ever go offline and were not archived, then the second source would be valuable. Although most information has just one citation, whenever there are extra citations, that helps reinforce that the information is likely to be accurate and serves as another resource of other information that could be used in the article. Adam MLIS (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Additional edits
editHaving done some general edits, I had some ideas for additional edits. Some of the items in the Further readings section would be better served as sources to cite information in the article. There also appears to be some bare URLs that will need attention. If anyone has a picture of a tractor, that would be super helpful and that can be added to the image section of the Infobox. Adam MLIS (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)