Talk:Elections in Monaco
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year might not be correct
editOn page List of political parties in Monaco it says that the coalition won in the year 2000. --HymylyTC 20:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- It is 2003. Electionworld 20:45, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Math and source error
editI have no idea where the numbers are coming from. Obviously, the total is not correct. I thought it would be a simple fix, but then I went to check the sources, and found one link doesn't work, and the other doesn't correspond to the numbers displayed. I went to edit the article, and see it's apparently using a template to get the numbers from. So, hopefully somebody familiar with this can fix it. --Rob (talk) 06:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elections in Monaco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130508013225/http://www.monaco-mairie.mc/annonces/resultats-elections-nationales-2013-/le-scrutin-en-chiffres to http://www.monaco-mairie.mc/annonces/resultats-elections-nationales-2013-/le-scrutin-en-chiffres
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)