Talk:Electoral results for the Division of Cunningham

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Electoral results for the Division of Cunningham is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

'49 result

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The votes/percentages don't add up. Timeshift (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you were right - it was a typo for the Communist result, which had them outpolling the Liberals! Fixed now. Frickeg (talk) 22:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic