Talk:Electracy

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-01-06. The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge Proposal

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

A merge proposal tag was added to this page, suggesting a merge of this page with digital literacy. I did not place the tag, but I Support a merge of Electracy and digital literacy as these topics have a large degree of overlap. Dialectric (talk) 01:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with the merge and reinstated the page. The original discussion for including this page in the first place dealt with some of these issues. rsmyth (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The merger was proposed in March of 2012 and carried out two months later so you had plenty of time to register opposition. You're welcome to raise the issue anew if you believe Electracy should be its own article and I've begun a section here to discuss it. ElKevbo (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article was reinstated after discussion on Digital literacy talk page. ElKevbo suggested that we reference that discussion here. He also suggested adding a section to this page called "How electracy differs from digital literacy" to avoid future suggestions to merge. 04:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsmyth (talk • contribs) Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060910061700/http://institute.emerson.edu/vma/faculty/john_craig_freeman/imaging_place/about/projects/choragraphy/ulmer_tapes/index.html to http://institute.emerson.edu/vma/faculty/john_craig_freeman/imaging_place/about/projects/choragraphy/ulmer_tapes/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic