Talk:Electricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hey LOVI33, it's been a while since we talked! I will review the article today! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written:
   1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;

Remove ""Electricity" was met with acclaim from music critics." The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Removed. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• Too many quotes (WP:QUOTEFARM). Try paraphrase the bulk of the section. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

I have re-worded most of them into paraphrasing. I hope its okay. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• The Ultimate Boss, for these comments, are you referring to the critical reception section? LOVI33 00:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

1. 1. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
   1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
   2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
   3. it contains no original research; and
   4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
   1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

Are you sure you need to include all of the information about the song charting in the UK? "t. It spent a total of 20 weeks on the chart, with 7 being in the top 10, 9 being in the top 20, and 10 being in the top 40" The Ultimate Boss (talk)

Removed so now it states that it spent 20 weeks on the chart. LOVI33 00:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

1. 1. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
2. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
3. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
4. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
   1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
   2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
5. Overall
   1. 

LOVI33, Yes, it's the critical reception, sorry I forgot to mention that... The Ultimate Boss (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss, I have addressed all your concerns. Let me know if you want me to do anything else. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

LOVI33, Everything looks good! I'm going to ✓ Pass this! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.