Talk:Electromechanics

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vaatkins, Markfgrant, MattDavenport. Peer reviewers: Smaravarman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Photos?

Does anybody have any photos of the original Grand Central or Penn Station boards (which are now computer LCD0? Americasroof 02:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Name of page

Shouldnt this page be merged with Mechatronics ?--Light current 00:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

RF

I'm told that nowadays BAW (Bulk Acoustic Wave) filters are electromechanical devices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.109.65.205 (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

And SAW. 77.125.210.44 (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Major engineering branches?

The article states that the three pillars of engineering are electrical, mecanical and civil engineering, which seems questionable.--79.116.86.109 (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Useless list?

The list of schools in this article appears to be an invitation for linkspam. Is there any objection to removing it? Krushia (talk) 21:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I just removed it. Place objections here. Krushia (talk) 03:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Electromechanics/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

[[File:Link title == HeadPRAJESHline text == ]]

Last edited at 15:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Sahana's Peer Review

This article provides a very good outline of Electromechanics, and is a good general overview. My suggestions for improvement are:

• Have a stronger first sentence, it does not truly encompass all of electromechanics.
• Have more citations in the introduction. I believe that there are no citations in the second or third paragraph.
• Have more subheadings. I think the history is a good section, but the modern practice could be split up to include more specific examples.
• Talk more about the science and engineering that goes into electromechanics.
• Add a section for what the future holds, and include the last paragraph of the modern practice in there.

My suggestions for grammar are:

• Use a comma in the second sentence of the first paragraph before "and how the two disciplines interact with each other."
• I believe that the second sentence of the second paragraph is too long and a bit confusing.

The article is a good start, but I think it would be greatly enhanced with more content and re-organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaravarman (talk • contribs) 17:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC) - Sahana Maravarman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaravarman (talk • contribs) 16:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Electromechanics

engineering 136.158.34.112 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)