Talk:Electrorheological fluid

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changing "extremely fine particles" to "extremely fine conductive particles" for clarification. -jskrzypek@gmail.com

The cite "Tao, R.; Huang, K.; Tang, H.; Bell, D (2008). "Electrorheology leads to Efficient Combustion". Energy & Fuels 22 (6): 3785-3788." has fallen into serious scrutiny of its methods, claims, and results. http://arrow.utias.utoronto.ca/~ogulder/Z_Energy&Fuels2009comb_eff.pdf Also the company funding this research has been investigated for selling dubious products in the past. Therefore I am removing this cite and text the refers to it until independent conformation using acceptable standards and practices or a response to the charges leveled is accepted for publication in Energy and Fuels. DieselDude (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

parallel and perpendicular electrodes

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

parallel and perpendicular to what? Aarghdvaark (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The referenced study is useful for readers to learn about, but this paragraph may be misrepresenting the findings of the paper. The authors do not appear to take flow geometry into account when analyzing the results, which means that the perpendicular, alternating, partially interlocking "teeth" of the electrodes may not be the significant take-away, so much as the way in which the fluid behaves under viscosity changes in this geometry. Pmberkeley (talk) 20:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic