Talk:Električni Orgazam/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Električni Orgazam. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Requested move

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved per discussion. - GTBacchus^(talk) 02:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Električni Orgazam → Električni orgazam – Električni "orgazam" (not "Orgazam") is in accordance with Serbian orthography. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Against. The names of bands are a specific case. I'm asking the user which requested move to find a passage about the names of bands in any Serbian orthography book - which he won't be able to do, because there isn't any. During the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, magazines and books usually featured names written with only the first word written with capital letter. In the last twenty years, most of the magazines, books etc. feature names written in the accordance with Western orthography. When it comes to Električni Orgazam, all of their albums featured their name written with all letters capital, or with no capital letters (this can be easily checked), except Breskve u teškom sirupu vol. 1, which features both E and O capital. The band's official site features their name with both E and O capital. So, the band call themselves Električni Orgazam, and not Električni orgazam. Ostalocutanje (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Against. As with the move of the articles Korni Grupa and Riblja Čorba, I disagree as band names belong to the domain of popular culture and are not necessarily in accordance with linguistic rules of any language. For example Motörhead is not spelled right and should not be phonetically pronounced the way it does with this umlaut, not to mention that English language does not have umlauts in its alphabet. I am using the same argument in the other two discussions. --Milosppf (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment WP:Use English. this is the English Wikipedia, it should use English grammar. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 04:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Oppose per my rationale at Talk:Riblja Čorba#Requested move. No such user (talk) 06:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Oppose. Ridiculous, and part of a growing trend. Andrewa (talk) 09:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Električni Orgazam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)