Talk:Eleven Past One

Latest comment: 9 months ago by BerkutSimp in topic Changes needed

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (this article is based on a canadian pop Band Eleven Past One) --MusicPromoter1 (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The problem is, it's written to promote the band rather than just inform about them. It needs a complete rewrite, using original text, not text copied from last.fm or any other site on the web. —C.Fred (talk) 21:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
…Which I've just done. —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleven Past One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Changes needed

edit

I agree with a lot of the things which have been posted here, I think the page as a whole, while containing good information, does need an overhaul before us meagre copyeditors get in there. It'd be nice to apply the standard format for musicians to put the discographies, performances, etc. in boxes and sections as is typical. I don't think it should be outright deleted, but alternative sources should definitely be found when needed, and we could clean up the tone and verbiage once major format overhauls have been made BerkutSimp (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply