Talk:Elise Ippolito

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:601:9D00:DD20:E0FE:F249:85F9:2E39 in topic Reads like a Marketing Piece for a Local Artist
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elise Ippolito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reads like a Marketing Piece for a Local Artist

edit

The Wikipedia article reads like the subject wrote it as a marketing piece for herself. The limited citations are almost all defunct - they point to a couple local articles about her and college directories where her name apparently was listed as an attendee. The photo includes what appears to be her child - far more appropriate for social media. If every local artist had a Wikipedia entry, there would be tens of thousands of self-promoting, frivolous entries like this one. This article should be deleted. 2601:601:9D00:DD20:E0FE:F249:85F9:2E39 (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply