Talk:Elisha Gray

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 194.74.1.178 in topic Lack of information on the Synthesizer


Bias in Article

edit

is it me or does this page seem a bit bias? Swedishdave 16:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

It did seem a little biased at the end of the article, but appears more due to the way the sentence was written rather than any actual planned bias. But this article could also use some sources. --AeroKnight 18:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added a bunch of material to round out the biography and reduce bias, but sources on Gray are difficult to find. Google hits seem to be citing each other. Each of the references already cited: Evenson, Baker, and Coe has a section on Elisha Gray. Greensburger 15:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's probably bias because it is a huge and powerful company (AT&T) that have profited from Alexander Bell's thievery. That kind of crookery changes history.(Sasquatchuk 12:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)}Reply
In Evenson's book, which describes the dishonesty of Bell's lawyers and examiner Wilber, Bell is not described as a thief or crook, but merely naive about the hidden activities of the lawyers Pollok and Bailey and other people who founded the telephone company in Bell's name. The lawyers were not working for Bell, they were being paid by Bell's father-in-law Gardiner Hubbard. Bell received only a few shares of stock in the telephone company. The pro-Bell bias in biographies of Bell and telephone histories was partly do to the Bell company requiring in contracts that the parties agreed that Bell was the inventor of the telephone. Although years later AT&T became a very powerful company, in early 1879 the Bell Telephone Company nearly went bankrupt. It was only because Thomas Edison or one of his workers invented the carbon microphone/transmitter that saved the Bell company from extinction. Greensburger 04:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Patent Dispute Unclear

edit

I am sorry, but I find the section about the patent dispute very unclear as to who did exactly what first. Can somebody clear this up a bit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.88.64 (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I rewrote this section to clarify the unclear parts, add additional references, and to rearrange things in chronological sequence. Greensburger (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Liquid Microphone

edit

This struck me as interesting. I'm not sure how one would work, but it would seem (to me) to involve mercury. Thoughts?RSido 04:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Acid. Users sometimes burnt their clothing; occasionally their skin, until the carbon button came along. I guess it belongs in one of the articles; maybe this one. Jim.henderson 17:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your question inspired me to create a new page for Water microphone. Greensburger 18:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Elisha Gray and the telephone

edit

This section begins:

Because of Samuel White's opposition to Gray working on the telephone...

Unfortuneately there is no mention of who Samuel White is and why he would have any influence over Gray's work. Should this opening sentence be removed or more information added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcconkeyb (talkcontribs) 17:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I added a footnote to explain who Dr. Samuel White was. This is explained on page 14 of Evenson's book, already cited. Greensburger (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

In the graphic of Bell's notebook, I changed 'March 8' to 'March 9', as both the notebook and the body text use the latter date. So my reason is consistency rather than actual knowledge. Also wondering (from an editorial standpoint) whether the Gray item would be an 'excerpt' rather than 'excerpts'. An excerpt would be a single passage, right? Curious: where did the card come from? It looks as though prepared by a graphic artist, and isn't dated or authenticated at the same level as the notebook. (Oh, wait...I see now that it's a facsimile from Gray's caveat...maybe add this to caption?) Mvsmith (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Telautograph

edit

I think they worked best using 3 wires. There was practically no delay time, just the time it took electricity to travel through wires. Unlike modern fax machines or email. I wonder if they are still being used somewhere. As recently as 15 years ago, I saw Telautograph systems in parking garages, and at a control tower at large Air Force base near the west coast. I am not sure why the AF used it, but it probably had something to do with security. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcmpvernon (talkcontribs) 02:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC) I think they were for weather reports Rcmpvernon (talk) 01:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC) It looks as though prepared by a graphic artist, and isn't dated or authenticated at the same level as the notebook.Reply

Re: Underwater Signaling Device

edit

Gray's invention of a underwater signaling device is addressed in two sections of the article , "biography and early inventions" (next to last paragraph,last 3 sentences) , and also "Gray's further inventions" (next to last paragraph). Both seem to be unsourced and contain conflicting information about testing the device.

Could an editor please take a look at this and hopefully make some sense of it ?

Also the part about officers investigating his house and giving the invention to Oberlin College just raises questions that can't easily be explained since the information is unsourced.Jonel469 (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC) It looks as though prepared by a graphic artist, and isn't dated or authenticated at the same level as the notebook.Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elisha Gray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elisha Gray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elisha Gray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lack of information on the Synthesizer

edit

The article mentions that 'Gray is also considered to be the father of the modern music synthesizer' The citation provides no more information or evidence for this. I would suggest using a more comprehensive citation like this: https://120years.net/the-musical-telegraphelisha-greyusa1876/ or even (less detailed) this: https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/musical-telegraph/

I have not yet got to grips with editing and would not want to edit something erroneously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.74.1.178 (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply