Talk:Elissa Silverman
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Bangabandhu in topic POV in Positions section
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
POV in Positions section
editThe Positions section focuses on positions criticized by her opponents and describes them in the opponents' terms. Certainly family leave should be described more neutrally, and other positions should be included, such as public campaign finance. The cap on the Wizards facility might not even rate a mention, considering it's a minor proposal that was never implemented; in any case it should not be the most prominent position in the section. And the information about the election is not a position and will soon be out of date. If it is to be kept it should be moved to Electoral Result or maybe a new Elections section. KCinDC (talk) 23:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think that the language is biased. The Wizard's cap deserves mention, but if you think its skewed you should change it. Agreed that there is probably undue weight on her opponents.Bangabandhu (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)