Talk:Elixir (Duff and Allen novel)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MBG02 in topic became committed

help this page! please

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is never a good reason to keep an article that doesn't meet notability criteria. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

And looking at the example you used, Confessions of an Heiress made the NYT best-seller list - that's pretty notable. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

advertisement?

edit

i added the advertisement warning template because this reads like a press release in several places and doesn't discuss the actual book at all - 71.75.35.33 (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. The bare fact that a book exists shouldn't be article-worthy; there should be at least some indication of what the book is about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.143.205.150 (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Elixir (Duff novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

became committed

edit

Unusual phrase, used twice in the intro.

Does it mean she “signed a contract”, or she was “obligated to finish a promise she made to herself”, (or something else)?

Is there a story for why it’s “became” committed - and not “was” committed? Did something cause (either of them) to “become” committed? MBG02 (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply