Talk:Elizabeth Booth/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Major RevisionEmmaEgnaczyk (talk) 04:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)EmmaEgnaczyk
Me and my colleague are working on a major revision to the Elizabeth Booth article. We have a lot more information we found to present in the article that goes in depth on Elizabeth Booth. We will go in detail on her early life, historical legacy, reputation, marriage and children, and death and afterwards. We will also discuss her major role in the Salem Witch trials.
Article ReviewEmmaEgnaczyk (talk) 04:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)EmmaEgnaczyk
1. Is there any information you have trouble finding in the source that it was provided by? 2. Is there any information that is not clear, or is there any section/topic that has confusing information?
Major Revision, April 2019
Me and my colleague are currently working on a major revision to the Elizabeth Booth article. We have looked through reliable sources and found credidible information on Elizabeth Booth. We will be adding headings and subheadings in regards to different aspects and parts of her life. We will first add a lead section, then add sections on her life before the trial, her role in the Salem Witch Trials, her being accused, her being the accuser, and specific testimonies she was involved in. We will also talk about the specifics of the trial, her life after the trial, which included subheadings on marriage and children, and death. We will also be adding media and have references listed at the end.EmmaEgnaczyk (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)EmmaEgnaczyk
Revision for the Reference SectionEmmaEgnaczyk (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC)EmmaEgnaczyk
After me and my colleague discussed the "References" section we decided to make a change. A user moved the "Notes" section to under the "References" section, making the bibliography one large section. We looked at many featured articles and decided that the majority of articles have two different sections, "References" and "Notes." We thought that this was more clear to have amd so we changed the article back to having two sections as we thought this made more sense.