Talk:Elizabeth Eastlake

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Needs more on Jane Eyre review

edit

The Jane Eyre review is quite remarkable for being based on a kind of callous and brutal Malthusianism (what would later be called Social Darwinism), which is poorly-disguised under a thick surface layer of smugly sanctimonious religiosity bordering on a perniciously over-simplistic version of Calvinism. There needs to be more on the review, if for no other reason than that Charlotte Bronte included extensive excerpts from it in her novel Shirley. However, it seems that the Jane Eyre review has been what Lady Eastlake has been most known for over the last 35 years. Churchh (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Eastlake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply