Talk:Elizabeth Spiers

Untitled

This clearly seems to be an article written by that Elizabeth Spiers herself. It should be removed for lack of relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.244.239 (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

• I agree. It is very clearly written because a person like this is dead-in-the-water if they do not have enough publicity. And the status of being included on "Wikipedia" would add some substance, to (if you go to her website) someone who clearly lacks it. For obvious reasons, this article should be removed. They may be important to their friends hanging out in a clique in Manhattan, but certainly do not warrant mention on Wikipedia... While this may be harsh their presence on Wikipedia is almost entirely based on their need for elevated self-importance... Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC).

Relevance

It may have relevance as part of the Web world, but that needs explanation - how and why are any of these blogs "influential"? What does that mean for those industries? What did the gossip consist of? There could be an article, but it needs expansion and providing context.Parkwells (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elizabeth Spiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070323010340/http://www.supermogul.com:80/ to http://supermogul.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Spiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130915223843/http://www.businessweek.com:80/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2007/04/elizabeth_spier_1.html to http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2007/04/elizabeth_spier_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)