Talk:Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs Marine National Park Reserve

Split into two articles?

Whilst these reefs are closely located and are often referenced together the reefs have a number of different features. The protection provided to each reef differs under the heritage act. Obviously the geographic position of each reef is diffent and this impacts the ability to link the article into geo browsers such as google earth. I was considering an article for each reef.

Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejboyd1 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• Support I dont see why not and your reasons are fair. If you do the split don't forget to update the 5 main backlinks to this article. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• Support Putting the reefs together in one article is arbitrary, even more so since there is no real name for the group of two (you might also call it Middleton and Elizabeth Reefs).--Ratzer (talk) 09:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs Marine National Park Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110919211637/http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-pubs-annolist-annotated-ramsar-16713/main/ramsar/1-30-168%5E16713_4000_0__ to http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-pubs-annolist-annotated-ramsar-16713/main/ramsar/1-30-168%5E16713_4000_0__

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)