Talk:Elligood (1794 ship)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Australia: Maritime Start‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Elligood (1794 ship) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elligood (1794 ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709083440/http://www.1812privateers.org/Great%20Britain/marque1793-1815.htm to http://www.1812privateers.org/Great%20Britain/marque1793-1815.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dickson or Dixson

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

No explanation given for the different spellings.Ealtram (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ealtram: At the time variant spellings were common. I have seen persons signing letters inconsistently, or senior officers transmitting a letter from their subordinates where the senior officer uses a different spelling for the junior officer's name than the one in the junior officer's signature. I also get a sense that in some cases newspaper reports were based on oral transmission of information gave rise to variant spellings. The problem goes beyond personal names. Around 1800 there was shift in usage between spellings where, for instance, "Rein Deer" became "Reindeer" and "Ring Dove" became "Ringdove". I try to use the spelling in the source document so that someone searching source documents can more readily find the info.Acad Ronin (talk) 19:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic