Talk:Ellsworthite
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Colonestarrice in topic Requested move 1 December 2021
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | On 29 January 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) to Uranpyrochlore. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
| On 1 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) to Ellsworthite. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 29 January 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 18:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) → Uranpyrochlore – At the present time, it is unclear why Uranpyrochlore redirects to Pyrochlore. For this reason, this page should move to the base title since it is a title match. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 23:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 19:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - @Steel1943: why not rename the article to "Ellsworthite", which seems to be used throughout the text? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, this article describes a particular variety of uranpyrochlore, "uranpyrochlore of the Ellsworthite variety" as some sources describe it. It was moved from the original Ellsworthite title a couple of years ago. There are other pyrochlores that include uranium such as hatchettolite. I personally would have thought that "Ellsworthite" would have been a less confusing title (sources using this exact form are not that many), but the move was made by Chris.urs-o who is an expert in this domain. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) is not a valid mineral name anymore. The pyrochlore supergroup/group should be updated. Uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) and uranpyrochlore are synonyms after mindat.org. All discredited names of pyrochlores and questionable mineral names of pyrochlores should be listed on pyrochlore supergroup/group. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, Rename to Ellsworthite, per Cwmhiraeth. Uranpyrochlore is a subset of Pyrochlore. It could be expanded to it's own page, as a list of all the minerals that have Pyrochlore chemical structure, while also including uranium. Ellsworthite is just one of the uranpyrochlores, and a subset of the much larger pyrochlore. Thus, renaming it to uranopyrochlore would be incorrect, in substituting the subset for the set immediately above it. Benkenobi18 (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 1 December 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed RM. (non-admin closure) Colonestarrice (talk) 17:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Uranpyrochlore (of Hogarth 1977) → Ellsworthite – WP:NATURALDIS, nonstandard disambiguator. Also consider Betafite as a potential target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Favonian (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.