Talk:Elusive
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 24 December 2019
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 24 December 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved to eat proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 15:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
– Clearly not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weirdly enough it is according to stats. --Less Unless (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. There's nothing else on WP that would take the title "Elusive". Station1 (talk) 09:04, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's only "clearly" not the ptopic if you consider the dictionary definition of the word as a competitor for primariness, which we shouldn't. Colin M (talk) 17:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support, and song failed to chart, why does it have an article? In ictu oculi (talk) 20:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't see any challenger to this song, which has notability from the Ivor Novello Awards. --Quiz shows 09:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is silly: there are only 2 entries on the disambiguation page. Leave the article Elusive alone and delete Elusive (disambiguation): I'll PROD it after this RM closes. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.