Talk:Elvira of Castile, Queen of Sicily

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elvira of Castile, Queen of Sicily article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sicily Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sicily, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sicily on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SicilyWikipedia:WikiProject SicilyTemplate:WikiProject SicilySicily articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 15 years ago9 comments7 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved Thryduulf (talk) 09:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Elvira of Castile (1100–1135) → Elvira of Castile, Queen of Sicily — original name before two renamings - the birth date for this queen is without reliable support; it is highly speculative and should not be given credence by making them part of the page name. Agricolae (talk) 03:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Let me add that the original change was made without discussion, as part of a more broad set of renamings based on dates. However, a naming system based on dates for medieval personages is problematic for several reasons. Dates are frequently hypothetical, speculative or arbitrary. Even when well attested, this certainty is often based on material not discovered until recent years, meaning that older sources will show different dates from before the true date was known. This means a reader looking for an individual is left guessing over which ideosyncratic and arbitrary combination of birth and death dates might be used for a page name. (The current example is a case in point, the birth of Elvira may have occurred anywhere over a seven year span.) Finally it is a matter of utility. Which is a person looking for this woman likely to know? Her precise birth and death dates, or the simple fact that she was queen of Sicily? For all these reasons, dates are inferior to the more straight forward title. Agricolae (talk) 03:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree; the last consideration, which applies to almost anybody less well-known than Julius Caesar, should be enough by itself. There are a couple of French Dauphins who died as infants and about whom nothing else is known; they are dabbed by year, but why should anybody else be? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm in favour of renaming in this case. I also think that Elvira of Castile should be a disambiguation page, since the other Elvira doesn't seem more notable than this one. Deb (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Concur with Deb. Srnec (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Deb. The marital title (which makes her notable) is more useful than the (possibly incorrect) years. Surtsicna (talk) 17:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree - All the above reasons. Consensus appears to have been reached, so carry on and rename. Jubilee♫clipman 19:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Tried to move page as per request but was blocked: "Name already exists or is invalid". Admin required! Jubilee♫clipman 20:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic