Talk:Elvis Mitchell
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The "Elvis" in Elvis Mitchell
editEarlier versions of Elvis Presley (e.g. this one) said: Elvis Mitchell, the former movie critic for the New York Times, was named after Presley by his parents. Is this true? If it's true perhaps it deserves mentioning in the article about Mitchell. Meanwhile, I've deleted it from Elvis Presley. -- Hoary 13:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Stature and Hairstyle
editThis remark that "Mitchell has become a recognizable figure in the popular film industry due in part to his work as a screenwriter, but also because of his six-foot frame and full head of dreadlocks" is being deleted as silly, irrelevant, vaguely racist and not provable as true. Being six feet tall is not so notably different as to differentiate him from most American men and combined with the note of his "full head of dredlocks" this just reeks of intimating that he is some big, scary-looking black man.
whoever wrote this is really dumbScoresheet 12:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
The dreadlocks are not "scary" so much as curious in that they don't match the color of his hair. And what is a "public intellectual"? I can't say that I am a fan. I saw the first installmant of his interview show last night on TCM. He's kind of annoying and his questions were a bit inane. 72.92.4.157 (talk) 15:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
The New York Magazine article in the External links section begins with a reference to Mitchell's looks as well. Are they really dumb as well? I see no problem with a photo-less article having a decription of the person. Whether or not someone finds that 'scary' is their own problem. Ttenchantr 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious why Mitchell is identified as "an African-American and film critic." Would Pauline Kael be introduced as "a white and a film critic"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.147.44 (talk) 12:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Ebert show
editThe "lack of chemistry" has been disputed, so I'm deleting it for now. See indiewire.com, citing Ebert. -Colfer2 (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elvis Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708101705/http://oxford.bside.com/2010/films/conversationwithelvismitchell_elvismitchell_oxford2010 to http://oxford.bside.com/2010/films/conversationwithelvismitchell_elvismitchell_oxford2010
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100910/ap_en_ot/us_ebert_review_show
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elvis Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080805094727/http://www.tcm.com/2008/elvismitchell/index.jsp to http://www.tcm.com/2008/elvismitchell/index.jsp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Life and Career, para 3
editThe last sentence of this currently reads: "Yet Mitchell simply disappeared, leaving Schindler to run the office alone and to this day refuses to discuss his odd behavior." Is the wording of this entirely in keeping with neutral POV? Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)