Talk:Elysian Shadows

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Nbisbo in topic should this be deleted?

Planned features

edit

I tagged the "Planned features" list as unsourced and advertisement/buzzword-heavy crystal-ball material. While I doubt this will end up as vaporware, we need to be careful about highlighting shiny features of an unreleased game, especially when it's unsourced. Even if sources appear, we should pare it back to what reliable, third-party sources consider its key features. I don't have much time to look through sources now, but I wanted to leave a note to avoid it seeming like drive-by tagging. If I can't find sources after a few days, I'll remove the section. Woodroar (talk) 02:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is a primary source but it is also the Kickstarter video for the game and it shows all the features in action.--Cube b3 (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhy9Rd9KNdc

Not only is it a primary source, but it's a sales-oriented primary source, and will inherently be "unduly self-serving" in showcasing the product's selling points. It's not that I don't believe the features exist, but we need a reliable, third-party source to tell us which of them are important. Woodroar (talk) 05:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
You can go ahead and use the Kotaku reference for that then as they have all reported on it.
http://kotaku.com/a-16-bit-rpg-that-promises-a-modern-twist-1626228329 --209.184.116.196 (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Story section

edit

The Story section is just ripped from the game's website: http://www.elysianshadows.com/game/information/

Opinions? Should it be re-written? Should it be replaced with blockquote? Not going to re-write myself (at least not now) but figured I'd point it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngsaucin (talkcontribs) 10:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

should this be deleted?

edit

The game is never coming out and the creator took the money and ran. he ignores any inquiries about the game and by all accounts it's considered a scam. I don't think it deserves a Wikipedia page. 145.40.173.69 (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you feel that way nominate for deletion but make sure you have sources for your clams Nbisbo (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply