Talk:Email spam legislation by country

Untitled

The hyperlinks are not up to date. Should be changed because the list is very helpfull

Dead Links

I _don't_ know wikipedia's policy well enough what to do, but numerous references are now dead, including specifically #10, the ITU report. Rallias Ubernerd 23:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rallias (talk • contribs)

number 5 is also dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! german wikipedia is much better with that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.232.15.252 (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Email spam legislation by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20100620124837/http://www.oecd-antispam.org/countrylaws.php3 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080827191919/http://www.oecd-antispam.org/countrylaws.php3 on http://www.oecd-antispam.org/countrylaws.php3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Canada and EU

Why does Canada have three different sections in the table? And also the EU is not a country so it should be in a separate section or removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordsunkel (talk • contribs) 18:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Bulgaria

I do not think that it is true to say that spam is legal in Bulgaria. From the Electronic Commerce Act, 2003 (as amended):

(4) Sending unwanted commercial communications to consumers without their preliminary consent shall be forbidden.

It's an awful translation (I don't speak bulgarian, but the english is just dreadful). But Bulgaria is part of the EU, and EU directives apply; member states are required to implement anti-spam legislation compliant with the directive. MrDemeanour (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

• agree. I've moved the row into the main table and deleted the unsourced info ... richi (hello) 15:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

References