Talk:Embolization
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
'-ize' vs. '-ise'
editWRT the spelling changes I made, I realize that either is correct, but since the article title uses the -ize spelling, I thought it should be consistent Darguz Parsilvan 01:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Embolic agents
editRegarding the length of the Embolisation#Agents list and the general complexity of the topic, I propose to create a seperate page for Embolic Agents. - Biomeddude — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biomeddude (talk • contribs) 17:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Agree Sounds good. Be careful about wp:NPOV here. That section in particular is at risk of sounding like an advert for the procedure and the companies that make those drugs (devices?) BakerStMD T|C 21:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Embolization is also a complication
editThis page is written like an advert for Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Embolization is a general term describing debris flowing downstream in a blood vessel. In addition to a radiological procedure, it is also a complication of surgery, and a general process causing things like blue toe syndrome and Air embolism and fat embolism The intro needs to reflect these. BakerStMD T|C 20:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Is "warning" for link to
editI wikified the link to Esophageal_varices, and added following "warning" in parentheses for the aid of those who may have sensitive stomachs (perhaps a pun is intended):
- "warning, endoscopic image of an esophagus may be disturbing to some"
Is this in any way inappropriate - i.e. does it constitute some kind of "censorship"? After all, it does not actually "censor" anything - just alerting people to an image they might personally find objectionable, and so might want to place a palm over the screen before they click? Jimw338 (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Theapeutic embo vs just embo
editI tried to distinguish between therapeutic and non-therapeutic embolization on this page, and in the absence of discussion here as to why the two should be equated, I'm defending those edits with reverts. BakerStMD 03:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Propose rename to "therapeutic embolization"
editThis page is about therapy. The page about pathologic embolization is at embolism. One is the noun and one the participle of "to embolize". Thus they should be separated, IMHO. BakerStMD 14:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Embolization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024001353/http://www.grandrounds-e-med.com:80/articles/gr100010.htm to http://www.grandrounds-e-med.com/articles/gr100010.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)