This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emily Winterburn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I believe this article should be B-class. Here is my assessment:
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. Y Every sentence is referenced with a reliable source. None of the sentences are controversial.
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. Y Notable works and a short biography is reasonably sufficient. May be missing a few bits of biographic information and a picture, but those have to be properly sourced.
The article has a defined structure. Y Sections are clearly arranged.
The article is reasonably well-written. Y Yes
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Y There is an infobox with the sourced information. Diagrams are N/A.
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. Y Yes, not technical at all.
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Every sentence is referenced with a reliable source. None of the sentences are controversial.
Notable works and a short biography is reasonably sufficient. May be missing a few bits of biographic information and a picture, but those have to be properly sourced.
