Talk:Emission computed tomography

Expand the current stub?

I tried to expand the current stub with an introduction:

expanded version

Please check whether this is appropriate and accept or reject this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigAndi (talk • contribs) 13:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Reply 7-OCT-2019

  Clarification requested  

• Part of the edit request process involves making the requisite disclosures regarding the nature of the COI. Specifically, if the COI editor receives, or expects to receive, compensation for any contribution they make, they must disclose their employer, client, and affiliation to comply with Wikipedia's terms of use and the policy on paid editing. Please advise by opening a new edit request when ready to proceed with your disclosure.

Regards,  Spintendo  17:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Request edit

Sorry the tag was missing. BigAndi (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

The tag has not been filled out correctly. The tag's |User1= parameter is blank. The COI editor has not stated whether or not they have been paid for the edits they are suggesting. if they have been paid, the tag's |U1-client= and |U1-employer= parameters need to be filled out, while the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template needs to be used. This information needs to be provided. Regards,  Spintendo  13:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#BigAndi,_MrOllie_and_a_Springer_textbook

I've not had time to do anything here and I've been waiting for a response from MrOllie, but otherwise I'm inclined to re-add this source and do some expansion with it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

I have not been paid to suggest this edit. I would also volunteer to do the expansion as suggested by Andy Dingley after the version is recovered. BigAndi (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

I'll defer to Andy Dingley and Ollie's good judgement on this. @Andy Dingley: If you have no concerns regarding the request at Talk:Projection-slice_theorem#requestedit from this same editor, I would be happy to implement it. Please advise. Regards,  Spintendo  05:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Reply 23-OCT-2019

  Request closed for inactivity  

• The above edit request has not received any non-COI editor responses for the past 2 weeks (15 days in total).
• Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from a reviewing editor. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing discussion.
• The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
• The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.
• Unless being assisted by another review editor, the COI editor is asked to allow for a reasonable amount of time to pass before reactivating a subsequent {{request edit}} template covering the same request.

Regards,  Spintendo  21:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)