Talk:Emma Little-Pengelly
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Noel Little
editI personally have no objection to describing Noel Little as a terrorist. However Wikipedia requires that article are written from a neutral point of view. Please could everyone abide by this protocol? Unknown Unknowns (talk) 08:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Sortkey
editJust a note here regarding the "DEFAULTSORT" key, because I've already had to correct it twice in just three days because somebody reinserted the wrong one after the first correction.
The DEFAULTSORT key does not affect how the article title displays, either here or in the category list; it only affects where the title lands in the alphabetical list. So the sortkey has to be based on information present in the title — if the sortkey here is "Little", for example, then all that does is cause the title "Emma Pengelly" to appear under the letter L instead of the letter P, which is incorrect. It does not cause the title to appear as "Emma Little Pengelly" in the category listing.
If you want her sorted under "Little", then you need to move the page to the title "Emma Little Pengelly". But as long as it remains at "Emma Pengelly" the sortkey has to be "Pengelly", because the sortkey has to be based on the page's actual title and not on alternate information not present in the title. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 10 June 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Guanaco 06:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Emma Pengelly → Emma Little Pengelly – Prodecural nomination — I'm filing this request on behalf of a user who does not know how to complete the process themself. The subject does appear to use the surname "Little Pengelly" rather than just "Pengelly" — but reliable source coverage about her seems split between both forms, so I'm not prepared to just arbitrarily move it on my own, especially since I'm not hugely knowledgeable about UK/NI politics and got involved only through generic wikicleanup rather than having much personal knowledge of her. I have no opinion either way on the merits, but wanted to raise it for discussion since it was requested in good faith. Bearcat (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support: On the ballot paper and on her official twitter account she is known as Emma "Little-Pengelly". I would support moving the page to "Emma Little-Pengelly". Brythones (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Support: I would support moving her page to Emma Little-Pengelly based on her official Twitter account Katie960 (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Users are far too quick to put what they think is the person's known name. If she puts Emma Little-Pengelly on her own literature I think that is definitiveBashereyre (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support. I moved this page to Emma Little Pengelly some time ago, but somebody moved it back for some reason. Mooretwin (talk) 08:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.