Talk:Emmerich Joseph de Dalberg

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

As a relatively new member and editor of Wikipedia, I have been visiting various pages and analyzing for minor changes such as spelling and grammar. On this particular page, I noticed that there seems to be a discrepancy in the manner in which the subject's name is spelled; Emmerich, and Emerich. Upon further research, it seems that in other areas of Internet, the spelling with the two m is more accurate, and thus, I have corrected for consistency.

Dr. Damian Stone. The Ecumenical Theological Seminary.TheEcumenicalTheologicalSeminary (talk) 23:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think that is correct, but note that the title of the Robert & Cougny article spells it with one "m", so that title should be preserved in the citation. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree the spelling with the two m's seems more accurate.TheEcumenicalTheologicalSeminary (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic