Talk:Emoxypine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Emoxypine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Half the statements have no sources. This is an advertisement, not a wiki article.

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I investigated the claimed information and it is copy/pasted from the main article cited(probably not a copyright violation but who knows). If you go to the main article it will produce 24 additional citations that support the listed claims. I think it would be redundant to have every statement in a bulleted list cite the same paper when the list itself is cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C54:7D00:3D28:1CAA:9E63:CAEC:2BBA (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree. There are far too many "nootropic" articles on Russian medications that present mechanistic pharmacology as clinical fact. I tried to correct a lot of the bromantane article but I still have a ways to go. Oro Temp (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Error in the formula

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The CH3 group at position 2 of the structure above should be replaced with C2H5. I do not know how to fix it. Maybe somebody knows. --Zwyciezca (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Biased statement?!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"similarly, US and EU companies do not seek approval for any medical use in Russia. ", that is simply not true... pharma companies seek permits on any markets they can get to, but entering the market of the big brown bear involves corruption on levels that few companies can afford. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.143.115.231 (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

benzodiazepine receptor

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is no such thing as a "benzodiazepine receptor" in the human brain, nor is that statement cited.

Benzodiazepines primarily bond to GABA_A receptors. Penguinnoir (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic