Talk:Emperor of Russia

Pretenders

There have been many discussions so I don’t know if this was one of them but why does the Russian Emperor article’s infobox list 2 pretends and the infobox on House of Romanov list 3? GamerKlim9716 (talk) 18:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 6 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 04:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Emperor of all the Russias → Emperor of Russia – The translation of the Russian "Император Всероссийский" would be closer to something like "Emperor of all Russia" or "All-Russian Emperor", but in English, the WP:COMMONNAME would just be "Emperor of Russia". The more literal translations can be mentioned in the lead. See Ngram as an example of usage. "Autocrat" is also used in the title but can be mentioned in the lead. Mellk (talk) 13:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

• Support per nom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 14:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Support. The current title is not only quirky sounding, it’s not even a good translation. As far as I can tell, vserossiiskii is literally “all-Russian” (in the sense of state, not nation), and makes no reference to plural Russias.  —Michael Z. 14:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

support per nom—blindlynx 14:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

• Support. It's a better title and is probably commoner, but I would point out that the formal title is commonly translated as "Emperor of all the Russias", so the current title is not really quirky or wrong. It appears in many, many English-language sources. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

  I’m aware it appears in sources, but that doesn’t prevent it from being absolutely quirky (a kind evaluation of the imperial concept of “the Russias”), nor from being an absolutely a less accurate translation (wrong) for the sake of some poetic nostalgia for the great days of empires, or whatever the heck.  —Michael Z. 15:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Portrait of Nicholas II

I do not see why the portrait of Nicholas II is a painting, when perfectly good quality photographs exist of him. 2A01:B340:85:1881:6D32:6862:E41E:BE9C (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

What is this 2400:1A00:B1E0:4AD8:4C58:D6E5:1AB1:ADA6 (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)