Talk:Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest

Cleanup

Fixed some material which I felt was inadequately written. Also transferred the campaign summaries from the Empire Earth page to this one. Finally, deleted the "initial reactions" because it was heavily biased (not NPOV) and I felt wasn't worth keeping. Also added the sidebar and uploaded the picture cover. This page is really becoming something interesting. Thunderforge 04:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

GApassed

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Good job; it could stand for a copy-edit and some more research/expansion for FA, but it's definitely GA material. — Deckiller 03:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

appears no significant copy edit has been done so I'll take a look at it now --carelesshx _talk 13:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Copy edit done, normalised spelling to US English as per WP:ENGVAR. Removed inuse tag, added LoCE tag to talk page. Notified User:Clyde Miller to proofread --carelesshx _talk 16:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

• Verifiability/original research concerns: all the subsections under the Campaigns section are completely unsourced. It needs to be reliably sourced and OR avoided if found. Also, the first paragraph in the Gameplay section is also unsourced (unless the citation in the following paragraph is that source, in which case a citation should be placed at the end of the first paragraph). The gameplay in Art of Conquest is the same as in the original Empire Earth, albeit with some changes reads like OR; a source is needed to verify this similarity. I have placed {{fact}} tags on other content portions that are unsourced.
• Prose concerns: The "Asian Campaign" subsection-paragraph is too long and should be split into two or three smaller paragraphs to improve readability.

MuZemike 20:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

None of the issues above have been addressed for the past week, so I am delisting from GA. It can be renominated for GA when the issues above are addressed. MuZemike 17:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929161557/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/similar.html?mode=versions to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/similar.html?mode=versions
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929223718/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/news.html?sid=2865776 to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/news.html?sid=2865776
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930204936/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/news.html?sid=2876571&mode=recent to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/news.html?sid=2876571&mode=recent
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930065525/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/review.html?sid=2881249 to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empireearththeartofc/review.html?sid=2881249

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)