Talk:Employment website/Archives/2019
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ohnoitsjamie in topic Source
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Employment website. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Source
[1] Benjamin (talk) 00:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Some websites in Japan have been criticized for charging high fees. Benjamin (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- How does a single vague sentence (and an empty section for the United States) add anything to the article? You don't think it's odd to have an article broadly discuss employement websites, with a separate section with a single sentence dedicated to Japan? Information about employment website and recruiting fees[2] would make more sense to discuss at Labor_market_of_Japan. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I would greatly appreciate if you would try to work collaboratively, rather than just reverting me. I do think this information is relevant here, as it is directly about the subject of the article. Perhaps it would be relevant in that other article too. But you shouldn't remove something just because it's incomplete. Instead, you should try to improve it. Wikipedia is a work in progress, after all. Benjamin (talk) 03:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's fine for material to evolve, but to just add a single sentence in a single standalone section is quite awkward and is nearly a non-sequitor in an otherwise reasonably mature article. I'm not convinced that there is enough material on criticism of a particular country's employment sites to merit it's only section. See also WP:NOTNEWS. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I would greatly appreciate if you would try to work collaboratively, rather than just reverting me. I do think this information is relevant here, as it is directly about the subject of the article. Perhaps it would be relevant in that other article too. But you shouldn't remove something just because it's incomplete. Instead, you should try to improve it. Wikipedia is a work in progress, after all. Benjamin (talk) 03:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly, I find this so discouraging. I'm just trying to help add information, because this is something I want to know about, and something that I want to help other people know about. That's why I edit Wikipedia. And I'm sure many other people would too, if it weren't for this terrible tendency to tear down, rather than build up. I'm not saying you're wrong, or unjustified, but I hope you understand the consequences of your actions. Benjamin (talk) 11:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- After I had my morning coffee, I took a stab at incorporating it in a less awkward fashion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:11, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly, I find this so discouraging. I'm just trying to help add information, because this is something I want to know about, and something that I want to help other people know about. That's why I edit Wikipedia. And I'm sure many other people would too, if it weren't for this terrible tendency to tear down, rather than build up. I'm not saying you're wrong, or unjustified, but I hope you understand the consequences of your actions. Benjamin (talk) 11:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)