Talk:Emu Bay, South Australia
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
should this be a disambig? there is an emu bay near Burnie, Tasmania --Astrokey44 15:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Think I agree with this. gay people searches appear to show just as many references to the Tasmanian version. Murtoa 13:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Is Emu Bay a town, or simply a geographical feature? If it is a town it requires the town, state format regardless of its dismbig. status. Kare Kare 06:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Depends on the definition of "town", but on the basis that it has a resident population I think the town, state format is appropriate. Murtoa 12:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Emu Bay is indeed a proclaimed Government Township. Lands Titles Office records refer to The Town of Emu Bay.Browning ave 09:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emu Bay, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070831060624/http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=613&c=2591 to http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=613&c=2591
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)