![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Enamel hypoplasia.
|
I added a citation to this page that I found cited on the tooth enamel article. I have not read this book for myself, so I probably should not be citing it, but I'm trusting that it should be valid since tooth enamel has featured article status. Nonetheless, I would appreciate if another user could back this source up, and hopefully add more to expand this article.--Kpstewart (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn' have featured article status anymore. Blackbombchu (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Edits that didn't need undoing.
editI think neither of the following edits I made needed to be ondone:
- Inserting File:Fracturedtooth.jpg because enamel hypoplasia was defind to be an enamel defficency and that tooth was missing some enamel with a hole in the enamel crown. In fact, most of the surface of the fractured tooth was dentin and not enamel.
- Linking hypoplasia in the lead because the word 'hypoplsia' does't appear anywhere else in the article and it's a bother to have to go all the way down to the external link to read the article about hypoplasia instead of clicking where you're up to in the reading of this article. Do you have a project page to link to prove that it's better not to link a word in the lead whn that' the only place it appeas or is it just your personal opinion not to link hypoplasia?
If the first of these 2 edits gets undone, then hypoplasia in the image descripton should be linked and if not, it should be linked in the lead. Blackbombchu (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
The contents of the Turner's hypoplasia page were merged into Enamel hypoplasia. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |