Talk:Endogeny (biology)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Chiswick Chap in topic Other fields
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-11-04. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Older comments
editI think it might be a good idea to merge this article with exogenous. Just my 2 cents.
- Both articles are horrible, but expanded versions might warrant separate articles Plasticup T/C 03:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal: Exogeny into Endogeny (biology)
editI propose to merge Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) since they cover sufficiently similar topics that they can be explained within the same context. Jamgoodman (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Other fields
editThe title and lede are written in order to make this an article about biology. The section about the term in other fields is off-topic. This is what hatnotes are for. Wikiacc (¶) 03:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comments invited. (Pinging Jamgoodman.) Wikiacc (¶) 03:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, all that stuff was, with respect, rubbish, totally off-topic. All that's left is a WP:DICDEF which shouldn't be on Wikipedia either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)